Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Nov;28(11):2670-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft355. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology?

Author information

1
ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Survival analyses are commonly applied to study death or other events of interest. In such analyses, so-called competing risks may form an important problem. A competing risk is an event that either hinders the observation of the event of interest or modifies the chance that this event occurs. For example, when studying death on dialysis, receiving a kidney transplant is an event that competes with the event of interest. Conventional methods for survival analysis ignoring the competing event(s), such as the Kaplan-Meier method and standard Cox proportional hazards regression, may be inappropriate in the presence of competing risks, and alternative methods specifically designed for analysing competing risks data should then be applied. This problem deserves more attention in nephrology research and in the current article, we therefore explain the problem of competing risks in survival analysis and how using different techniques may affect study results.

KEYWORDS:

censoring; competing risks; epidemiology; statistics; survival analysis

PMID:
23975843
DOI:
10.1093/ndt/gft355
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center