Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):506-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

The higher the better? Interval training intensity in coronary heart disease.

Author information

1
K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. Electronic address: trine.moholdt@ntnu.no.
2
K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Cardiology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway & Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
3
K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
4
K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Clinical Services, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) increases more after high intensity interval training compared to isocaloric moderate exercise in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). We assessed the impact of exercise intensity during high intensity intervals on the increase in VO2 peak.

DESIGN/METHODS:

We included 112 patients with coronary heart disease who had participated in randomized trials of interval training consisting of four times four minutes intervals at 85-95% of heart rate maximum (HRmax) for 12 weeks. Exercise intensity was calculated for each patient using HR during the two last minutes of each interval, expressed as percentage of HRmax. We used a univariate general linear model with VO2 peak increase as the dependent variable and percentage of HRmax, age, number of exercise sessions, and baseline VO2 peak as covariates. Exercise intensity was also divided into three categories; <88%, 88-92%, and >92% of HRmax, and these categories were used as a fixed factor in the model.

RESULTS:

VO2 peak increased by 3.9 (SD 3.1) mL kg(-1)min(-1), equal to 11.9% after 23.4 exercise sessions. Percentage of HRmax had a significant effect on increase in VO2 peak, both as a continuous (p=0.019) and categorical variable (p=0.020). The estimated marginal means and 95% confidence intervals of the increase in VO2 peak for the three intensity categories were 3.1 (2.0, 4.2), 3.6 (2.8, 4.4), and 5.2 (4.1, 6.3) for the <88%, the 88-92%, and the >92% category, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Even within the high intensity training zone, exercise intensity was an important determinant for improving VO2 peak in patients with coronary heart disease.

KEYWORDS:

Aerobic exercise; Cardiac; Intensity; Physical fitness; Rehabilitation

PMID:
23938444
DOI:
10.1016/j.jsams.2013.07.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center