Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Nov;10(11):1700-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

Low-amplitude, left vagus nerve stimulation significantly attenuates ventricular dysfunction and infarct size through prevention of mitochondrial dysfunction during acute ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Author information

1
Cardiac Electrophysiology Research and Training Center, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine. Electronic address: kshinlap@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Right cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) provides cardioprotective effects against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury in small animals. However, inconsistent findings have been reported.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether low-amplitude, left cervical VNS applied either intermittently or continuously imparts cardioprotection against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS:

Thirty-two isoflurane-anesthetized swine (25-30 kg) were randomized into 4 groups: control (sham operated, no VNS), continuous-VNS (C-VNS; 3.5 mA, 20 Hz), intermittent-VNS (I-VNS; continuously recurring cycles of 21-second ON, 30-second OFF), and I-VNS + atropine (1 mg/kg). Left cervical VNS was applied immediately after left anterior descending artery occlusion (60 minutes) and continued until the end of reperfusion (120 minutes). The ischemic and nonischemic myocardium was harvested for cardiac mitochondrial function assessment.

RESULTS:

VNS significantly reduced infarct size, improved ventricular function, decreased ventricular fibrillation episodes, and attenuated cardiac mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, depolarization, and swelling, compared with the control group. However, I-VNS produced the most profound cardioprotective effects, particularly infarct size reduction and decreased ventricular fibrillation episodes, compared to both I-VNS + atropine and C-VNS. These beneficial effects of VNS were abolished by atropine.

CONCLUSIONS:

During ischemia-reperfusion injury, both C-VNS and I-VNS provide significant cardioprotective effects compared with I-VNS + atropine. These beneficial effects were abolished by muscarinic blockade, suggesting the importance of muscarinic receptor modulation during VNS. The protective effects of VNS could be due to its protection of mitochondrial function during ischemia-reperfusion.

KEYWORDS:

AAR; Acetylcholine; C-VNS; Cardioprotection; ECG; HR; Heart; I-VNS; Ischemia-reperfusion injury; LAD; LV; PVC; ROS; VF; VNS; VT; Vagus nerve stimulation; area at risk; continuous-vagus nerve stimulation; electrocardiographic/electrocardiogram; heart rate; intermittent-vagus nerve stimulation; left anterior descending; left ventricular; premature ventricular contraction; reactive oxygen species; vagus nerve stimulation; ventricular fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia

PMID:
23933295
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center