Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Use and perceived benefits of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment in Italy.

Author information

1
Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPO), Florence, Italy; Centro Studi e Ricerca Synthesis, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: andreabonacchi@centrosynthesis.it.
2
Centro Studi e Ricerca Synthesis, Florence, Italy.
3
Oncologia Medica AUSL 1 Massa Carrara, Carrara, Italy.
4
Centro Riabilitazione Oncologica (CERION), Institute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPO), Florence, Italy.
5
Oncologia Medica AUSL 4 di Prato, Prato, Italy.
6
Oncologia Medica Aziendale AUSL 10, Florence, Italy.
7
Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi-Firenze, Florence, Italy.
8
Service of Psychosomatic Medicine, U.O. Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
9
Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPO), Florence, Italy.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

In Italy, data regarding the use of complementary therapies (CTs) among patients with cancer are sparse and discordant.

OBJECTIVES:

The present study aimed to investigate the demographic and psychological characteristics of Italian cancer patients who use CTs and the perceived benefit of users.

METHODS:

Eight hundred three patients from six Italian oncology departments were interviewed about CT use and completed two questionnaires to explore psychological distress and the resilience trait called sense of coherence (SOC). Patients included in the study had different primary tumor sites and were in different phases of the disease and care process.

RESULTS:

At the time of measurement, 37.9% of patients were using one or more types of CTs. The most commonly used CTs were diets and dietary supplements (27.5%), herbs (10.8%), homeopathy (6.4%), and mind-body therapies (5.5%). The Italian context is characterized by a high percentage of patients who informed their physicians about CT use (66.3%) and who experienced benefits (89.6%); 75.2% of the patients had used CTs in the past. Multivariate analysis revealed that young, female patients, who previously used complementary and alternative medicine in the past, appear more likely to use at least one type of CT in the present. Predictors of the use of CTs varied according to the type of CT. Among psychological factors, SOC was positively associated with both past and present CT use.

CONCLUSION:

Overall prevalence of CTs among Italian cancer patients is high and is in accordance with the European average. In addition to clinical and sociodemographic factors, the resilience trait SOC also was associated with CT use.

KEYWORDS:

Cancer; complementary therapy; oncology; psychological distress; sense of coherence

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center