Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Vis. 2013 Jul 15;13(8). pii: 12. doi: 10.1167/13.8.12.

Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Author information

1
Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. andrew_haun@meei.harvard.edu

Abstract

The visual system can distinguish different levels of blur and different levels of excess sharpness. Adaptation alters this capacity so that the adapted blur (or sharp) level looks more like a normal, properly focused image. Here, we describe the more general pattern of aftereffects of blur and sharp adaptation by measuring matching functions, using video clips from a DVD movie as stimuli. Results show that blur and sharp adaptation are selective: The sharpening aftereffects of blur adaptation are strongest for blurry videos while the blurring aftereffects of sharp adaptation are strongest for sharp videos. Despite the spatiotemporal variability of our adaptor and test stimuli, we found adaptation effects similar in magnitude to previous studies using invariant static images. A recent model of blur adaptation can be simplified to explain the form of our data, leading us to conclude that what we see as blur/sharp adaptation is a consequence of narrowband contrast adaptation.

KEYWORDS:

1/f amplitude spectra; blur adaptation; contrast adaptation; contrast enhancement; contrast sensitivity; individual differences

PMID:
23857949
PMCID:
PMC3712800
DOI:
10.1167/13.8.12
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center