Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.042. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

Enzalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressing after docetaxel and abiraterone.

Author information

1
Department of Urology, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: ajschrader@gmx.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Abiraterone, an androgen synthesis inhibitor, has been successfully used in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) for 2 yr. Enzalutamide is a second-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen that has recently been approved for the same indication.

OBJECTIVE:

This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of enzalutamide after failure of abiraterone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

Thirty-five patients were identified as having received sequential therapy with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide. All patients had undergone prior docetaxel chemotherapy, and no patient had received ketoconazole.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Posttreatment changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were used to determine the activity of enzalutamide in patients who had received prior abiraterone.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:

The median duration of abiraterone treatment was 9.0 mo (range: 2.0-19.0 mo). Of the 35 patients, 16 (45.7%) achieved a >50% decline in PSA, and 14 (40%) had a rising PSA as the best response. The median duration of subsequent enzalutamide treatment was 4.9 mo (Kaplan-Meier estimate; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-7.4). Seven of 16 CRPC patients who were initially abiraterone-sensitive (43.8%) and 3 of 19 CRPC patients who were initially abiraterone-insensitive (15.8%) showed a >50% PSA decline while taking enzalutamide. Of the 35 patients, 17 (48.6%) were primarily enzalutamide-resistant and showed a rising PSA as the best response. Median time to progression was 4.0 mo (95% CI, 2.0-6.0) for 18 of 35 patients with at least one declining PSA value while taking enzalutamide (51.4%). Of the 17 patients who were assessable radiologically, only 1 (2.9%) attained a confirmed partial response. Small sample size was the major limitation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Enzalutamide treatment achieved only a modest response rate in patients progressing after abiraterone. Although cross-resistance between abiraterone and enzalutamide was a common phenomenon, it was not inevitable, and a small but significant number of patients showed significant benefit from sequential treatment.

KEYWORDS:

Abiraterone; Biochemical failure; Cross-resistance; Enzalutamide; MDV3100; Sequential therapy

PMID:
23849416
DOI:
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.042
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center