The MPO-463G>A polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 22 case-control studies

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e65778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065778. Print 2013.

Abstract

Background: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an endogenous oxidant enzyme that produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) and may be involved in lung carcinogenesis. The MPO-463G>A polymorphism influences MPO transcription and has been associated with lung cancer susceptibility. However, the association between the MPO-463G>A polymorphism and lung cancer risk remains controversial.

Method: To investigate the effect of this polymorphism on lung cancer susceptibility, we performed a meta-analysis based on 22 published case-control studies including 7,520 patients with lung cancer and 8,600 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association.

Results: Overall, there was no evidence for significant association between MPO-463G>A polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility (for AA versus GG: OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.67-1.24; for GA versus GG: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.98; for AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80-1.01; for AA versus

Ga/gg: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.72-1.28). In the stratified analyses by ethnicity, source of controls and smoking status, we also did not find any significant association between them.

Conclusions: In summary, this meta-analysis suggests MPO-463G>A polymorphism may not be a risk factor for developing lung cancer. However, further prospective well-designed population-based studies with larger sample size are expected to validate the results.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Gene Frequency
  • Genetic Association Studies
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Models, Genetic
  • Peroxidase / genetics*
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Peroxidase

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science foundation of China (81071825/H1610). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.