Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2772-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

The "handwriting brain": a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes.

Author information

  • 1INSERM, Imagerie Cérébrale et Handicaps Neurologiques UMRS 825, Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, UPS, Imagerie Cérébrale et Handicaps Neurologiques UMRS 825, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France; URI Octogone (EA 4156), Université Toulouse II Le Mirail, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: samuel.planton@inserm.fr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Handwriting is a modality of language production whose cerebral substrates remain poorly known although the existence of specific regions is postulated. The description of brain damaged patients with agraphia and, more recently, several neuroimaging studies suggest the involvement of different brain regions. However, results vary with the methodological choices made and may not always discriminate between "writing-specific" and motor or linguistic processes shared with other abilities.

METHODS:

We used the "Activation Likelihood Estimate" (ALE) meta-analytical method to identify the cerebral network of areas commonly activated during handwriting in 18 neuroimaging studies published in the literature. Included contrasts were also classified according to the control tasks used, whether non-specific motor/output-control or linguistic/input-control. These data were included in two secondary meta-analyses in order to reveal the functional role of the different areas of this network.

RESULTS:

An extensive, mainly left-hemisphere network of 12 cortical and sub-cortical areas was obtained; three of which were considered as primarily writing-specific (left superior frontal sulcus/middle frontal gyrus area, left intraparietal sulcus/superior parietal area, right cerebellum) while others related rather to non-specific motor (primary motor and sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, thalamus and putamen) or linguistic processes (ventral premotor cortex, posterior/inferior temporal cortex).

CONCLUSIONS:

This meta-analysis provides a description of the cerebral network of handwriting as revealed by various types of neuroimaging experiments and confirms the crucial involvement of the left frontal and superior parietal regions. These findings provide new insights into cognitive processes involved in handwriting and their cerebral substrates.

KEYWORDS:

Functional neuroimaging; Handwriting; Meta-analysis; Spelling

PMID:
23831432
DOI:
10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center