Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2013 Sep;206(3):428-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

Foundations for teaching surgeons to address the contributions of systems to operating room team conflict.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA. darogers@uab.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Prior research has shown that surgeons who effectively manage operating room conflict engage in a problem-solving stage devoted to modifying systems that contribute to team conflict. The purpose of this study was to clarify how systems contributed to operating room team conflict and clarify what surgeons do to modify them.

METHODS:

Focus groups of circulating nurses and surgeons were conducted at 5 academic medical centers. Narratives describing the contributions of systems to operating room conflict and behaviors used by surgeons to address those systems were analyzed using the constant comparative approach associated with a constructivist grounded theory approach.

RESULTS:

Operating room team conflict was affected by 4 systems-related factors: team features, procedural-specific staff training, equipment management systems, and the administrative leadership itself. Effective systems problem solving included advocating for change based on patient safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study provide clarity about how systems contribute to operating room conflict and what surgeons can do to effectively modify these systems. This information is foundational material for a conflict management educational program for surgeons.

KEYWORDS:

Conflict management education; Operating room conflict; Systems contributions

PMID:
23827514
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center