Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):817-31. doi: 10.1177/0963662512440220. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production.

Author information

1
Wageningen University, ‚ÄČThe Netherlands.

Abstract

The strategic development of novel nanotechnologies will be determined by their public acceptance, which in turn may be influenced by public perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with the specific applications. At the present time, public opinions towards nanotechnologies remain largely inchoate, although this is likely to change with increasing public exposure to relevant information. In two experiments, a total of 618 participants, from the UK population, were provided with different risk-benefit information on nanotechnology application in food. The results show that the provision of both risk and benefit information does not influence average attitude, but results in some individuals becoming more positive and less ambivalent and others more negative and less ambivalent towards nanotechnologies. A third group maintained a neutral attitude and became more ambivalent. It is concluded that to understand public opinion formation about nanotechnology keeping track of polarization and ambivalence is important.

KEYWORDS:

attitude formation; attitudinal ambivalence; nanotechnology; new technology; public debate

PMID:
23825237
DOI:
10.1177/0963662512440220
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center