Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):948-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure.

Author information

1
General Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. Electronic address: surg_latif@hotmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has become an accepted way of management. Patch omentoplasty stayed for decades the main method of repair. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic simple repair of PPU is as safe as patch omentoplasty.

METHODS:

Since June 2005, 179 consecutive patients of PPU were treated by laparoscopic repair at our centers. We conducted a retrospective chart review in December 2012. Group I (patch group) included patients who were treated with standard patch omentoplasty. Group II (non-patch group) included patients who received simple repair without patch.

RESULTS:

From June 2007 to Dec. 2012, 179 consecutive patients of PPU who were treated by laparoscopic repair at our centers were enrolled in this multi-center retrospective study. 108 patients belong to patch group. While 71 patients were treated with laparoscopic simple repair. Operative time was significantly shorter in group II (non patch) (p = 0.01). No patient was converted to laparotomy. There was no difference in age, gender, ASA score, surgical risk (Boey's) score, and incidence of co-morbidities. Both groups were comparable in terms of hospital stay, time to resume oral intake, postoperative complications and surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Laparoscopic simple repair of PPU is a safe procedure compared with the traditional patch omentoplasty in presence of certain selection criteria.

KEYWORDS:

Omental patch; PPU; Simple closure

PMID:
23806652
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center