The San Francisco Syncope Rule performs well in a regional rural emergency department in New Zealand

N Z Med J. 2013 May 10;126(1374):29-33.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the utility of a decision rule for determining short-term risk in syncope patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of Nelson Hospital (Nelson, New Zealand).

Methods: Sixty-eight of 83 eligible syncope patients who presented to the ED with syncope were consecutively enrolled. Follow-up for an adverse event within 7 days of index presentation was performed. Actual event rate was compared with the prediction tool known as the San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR).

Results: Sensitivity and specificity for the SFSR was 83% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 44-97%) and 82% (95%CI 71-91%) respectively. There was a negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI 90-99%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.7 (95% CI 2.5-9.0) and 0.2 (95% CI 0.03-01.22) respectively.

Conclusion: Syncope patients who present to the ED with no obvious cause and who are being considered for discharge may benefit from application of the SFSR for short-term risk assessment.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / etiology
  • Blood Pressure
  • Cause of Death
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Dyspnea / complications
  • Electrocardiography
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Heart Failure / complications
  • Hematocrit
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / etiology
  • New Zealand
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pulmonary Embolism / etiology
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Rural Health Services
  • Stroke / etiology
  • Syncope / complications*
  • Young Adult