Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;10(8):460-71. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.100. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Author information

1
Myeloid Malignancies Section, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 10 Centre Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1583, USA. hourigan@nih.gov

Abstract

Technological advances in the laboratory have led to substantial improvements in clinical decision making through the introduction of pretreatment prognostic risk stratification factors in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Unfortunately, similar progress has not been made in treatment response criteria, with the definition of 'complete remission' in AML largely unchanged for over half a century. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that high-sensitivity measurements of residual disease burden during or after treatment can be performed, that results are predictive for clinical outcome and can be used to improve outcomes by guiding additional therapeutic intervention to patients in clinical complete remission, but at increased relapse risk. We review these recent trials, the characteristics and challenges of the modalities currently used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD), and outline opportunities to both refine detection and improve clinical use of MRD measurements. MRD measurement is already the standard of care in other myeloid malignancies, such as chronic myelogenous leukaemia and acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). It is our belief that response criteria for non-APL AML should be updated to include assessment for molecular complete remission and recommendations for post-consolidation surveillance should include regular monitoring for molecular relapse as standard of care.

PMID:
23799371
PMCID:
PMC4163748
DOI:
10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.100
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center