Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurol Sci. 2013 Aug 15;331(1-2):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale.

Author information

1
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 906 S Goodwin Ave, Freer Hall, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Fatigue is one of the most common, debilitating and life altering symptoms experienced by those with multiple sclerosis (MS) and has become the focus of therapeutic interventions and clinical rehabilitation. There is limited evidence regarding the psychometric properties and clinical relevance of fatigue outcomes for interpreting the effectiveness of intervention and rehabilitation strategies. This study determined the reliability, precision and clinically important change of the uni-dimensional Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the multi-dimensional Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS).

METHODS:

The FSS and MFIS along with physical, psychological and cognitive clinical outcomes were administered to a sample of 82 persons with MS in a clinical research setting on two time points, separated by six months. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses established reliability; standard error of measurement (SEM) and coefficient of variation (CV) determined precision; minimal detectable change (MDC) defined clinically important change.

RESULTS:

Participants varied in type of MS and disability status, with 77% of participants classified as having substantial fatigue, based on the criteria of a mean FSS score ≥4. The MFIS (ICC=0.863) and the FSS (ICC=0.751) had acceptable reliability over six months. Precision was reasonable for both scales (based on SEM and CV estimates) but better for the FSS. MDC estimates were established and were lower for the FSS.

CONCLUSION:

Reliability of the FSS and MFIS falls within acceptable ranges, and precision and clinically important change estimates provide guidelines for interpreting change in scores from these outcomes in clinical research of intervention and rehabilitation approaches for managing fatigue.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical change; Fatigue; Multiple Sclerosis; Outcome measures; Precision; Reliability; Validity

PMID:
23791482
DOI:
10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center