Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Oct;10(3):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Author information

1
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, 5042, damianhadams@yahoo.com.au.

Abstract

Since its inception, donor conception practices have been a reproductive choice for the infertile. Past and current practices have the potential to cause significant and lifelong harm to the offspring through loss of kinship, heritage, identity, and family health history, and possibly through introducing physical problems. Legislation and regulation in Australia that specifies that the welfare of the child born as a consequence of donor conception is paramount may therefore be in conflict with the outcomes. Altering the paradigm to a child-centric model, however, impinges on reproductive choice and rights of adults involved in the process. With some lobby groups pushing for increased reproductive choice while others emphasise offspring rights there is a dichotomy of interests that society and legislators need to address. Concepts pertaining to a shift toward a child-centric paradigm are discussed.

PMID:
23780686
DOI:
10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center