Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.69. Epub 2013 May 30.

Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.

Author information

1
1] Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
2
Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
3
Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
4
Skills Lab, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
5
The Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Education and Resident Training, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
7
Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

General practitioners are increasingly called upon to deliver genetic services and could play a key role in translating potentially life-saving advancements in oncogenetic technologies to patient care. If general practitioners are to make an effective contribution in this area, their genetics competencies need to be upgraded. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oncogenetics training for general practitioners improves their genetic consultation skills.

METHODS:

In this pragmatic, blinded, randomized controlled trial, the intervention consisted of a 4-h training (December 2011 and April 2012), covering oncogenetic consultation skills (family history, familial risk assessment, and efficient referral), attitude (medical ethical issues), and clinical knowledge required in primary-care consultations. Outcomes were measured using observation checklists by unannounced standardized patients and self-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS:

Of 88 randomized general practitioners who initially agreed to participate, 56 completed all measurements. Key consultation skills significantly and substantially improved; regression coefficients after intervention were equivalent to 0.34 and 0.28 at 3-month follow-up, indicating a moderate effect size. Satisfaction and perceived applicability of newly learned skills were highly scored.

CONCLUSION:

The general practitioner-specific training proved to be a feasible, satisfactory, and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics consultation skills and could be used as an educational framework to inform future training activities with the ultimate aim of improving medical care.

PMID:
23722870
PMCID:
PMC3914027
DOI:
10.1038/gim.2013.69
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center