Cost effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy for treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection in the veterans health administration

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 May 22.

Abstract

Background & aims: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest single provider of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the United States. We analyzed the cost effectiveness of treatment with the HCV protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir in a defined managed care population of 102,851 patients with untreated chronic genotype 1 infection.

Methods: We used a decision-analytic Markov model to examine 4 strategies: standard dual-therapy with pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin (PR), the combination of boceprevir and PR triple therapy, the combination of telaprevir and PR, or no antiviral treatment. A sensitivity analysis was performed. Sources of data included published rates of disease progression, the census bureau, and VHA pharmacy and hospitalization cost databases.

Results: The estimated costs for treating each patient were $8000 for PR, $31,300 for boceprevir and PR, and $41,700 for telaprevir and PR. Assuming VHA treatment rates of 22% and optimal rates of sustained virologic response, PR, boceprevir and PR, and telaprevir and PR would reduce relative liver-related deaths by 5.2%, 10.9%, and 11.5%, respectively. Increasing treatment rates to 50% would reduce liver-related deaths by 12%, 24.7%, and 26.1%, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $29,184/quality-adjusted life-years for boceprevir and PR and $44,247/quality-adjusted life-years for telaprevir and PR vs only PR. With the current 22% treatment rate, total system-wide costs to adopt boceprevir and PR or telaprevir and PR would range from $708 to $943 million.

Conclusions: Despite substantial up-front costs of treating HCV-infected patients in the VHA with PR, or telaprevir and PR, each regimen improves quality of life and extends life expectancy by reducing liver-related morbidity and mortality, and should be cost effective. Further efforts to expand access to direct-acting antiviral therapy are warranted.

Keywords: Cirrhosis; DAA; HCC; HCV; Health Care Costs; ICER; IL; Liver Disease; PR; Prevention; QALY; SVR; VHA; Veterans Health Administration; boc; boceprevir; direct-acting antiviral; hepatitis C virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; interleukin; pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin; quality-adjusted life-year; sustained virologic response; tel; telaprevir.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Antiviral Agents / economics*
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / economics
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / methods
  • Female
  • Genotype
  • Hepacivirus / classification*
  • Hepacivirus / genetics*
  • Hepacivirus / isolation & purification
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / drug therapy*
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / economics*
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / virology
  • Humans
  • Interferons / economics
  • Interferons / therapeutic use
  • Life Expectancy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Oligopeptides / economics
  • Oligopeptides / therapeutic use
  • Proline / analogs & derivatives
  • Proline / economics
  • Proline / therapeutic use
  • Quality of Life
  • Ribavirin / economics
  • Ribavirin / therapeutic use
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Veterans Health*

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Oligopeptides
  • Ribavirin
  • telaprevir
  • N-(3-amino-1-(cyclobutylmethyl)-2,3-dioxopropyl)-3-(2-((((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)carbonyl)amino)-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo(3.1.0)hexan-2-carboxamide
  • Interferons
  • Proline