Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer. 2013 Aug 15;119(16):2956-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28168. Epub 2013 May 14.

Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: Have we improved?

Author information

1
Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Inclusion of diverse groups of participants in cancer clinical trials is an important methodological and clinical issue. The quality of the science and generalizability of results depends on the inclusion of study participants who represent all populations among whom these treatment and prevention approaches will be used.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review using OVID as the primary source of reports included. Based on 304 peer-reviewed publications, diversity in the inclusion and reporting of study participants during a decade of cancer treatment and prevention trials (2001-2010) is summarized. Recommendations are made for improvements in the science and reporting of cancer clinical trials.

RESULTS:

Of the 277 treatment trials and 27 prevention trials included in this report, more than 80% of participants were white and 59.8% were male. In the recent decade, race and sex are rarely used as selection criteria unless the trial is focused on a sex-specific cancer.

CONCLUSIONS:

Women and racial/ethnic minorities remain severely underrepresented in cancer clinical trials, thus limiting the generalizability of cancer clinical research.

KEYWORDS:

cancer clinical trials; health disparities; participant selection; prevention; treatment

PMID:
23674318
DOI:
10.1002/cncr.28168
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center