Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Surg. 2013 Jul;206(1):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.08.017. Epub 2013 May 11.

Implementing acute care surgery at a level I trauma center: 1-year prospective evaluation of the impact of this shift on trauma volumes and outcomes.

Author information

1
Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the transition to acute care surgery (ACS) on trauma volumes and outcomes.

METHODS:

All admissions from 2 1-year periods from June 2008 to May 2010 (1 year before ACS and 1 year after ACS) to the LAC+USC Medical Center were prospectively collected. In anticipation of this change, trauma patient demographics, clinical data, and outcomes (trauma volume and preventable and potentially preventable deaths and complications) were prospectively collected.

RESULTS:

Before ACS, there were 5,378 trauma admissions. After ACS, there were 5,726 (66.5%) trauma and 2,886 (33.5%) nontrauma admissions. There were no demographic or clinical differences between trauma patients in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in overall mortality (3.8% before ACS vs 3.3% after ACS, P = .292). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of preventable and potentially preventable deaths or complications observed (1.2% vs 1.0%, P = .374) during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite a 60% increase in total patient volume and a 233% increase in operative volume over the study period, the addition of emergency surgery to a trauma service did not compromise trauma patient outcomes.

PMID:
23673013
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.08.017
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center