Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;32(4):708-14.

Sick but satisfied: the impact of life and health satisfaction on choice between health scenarios.

Author information

1
Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.

Abstract

Preference elicitation methods require respondents to predict the impact a change in health might have on their future selves. The focus on the change in health is at the possible expense of other experiences of life once in that health state. We analyse personal preferences to a pairwise choice task involving trade-offs between quality and length of life, where satisfaction levels with life or health are introduced in the description of the health states. We find that a health scenario including low levels of satisfaction increases the likelihood of preferring to die sooner in full health, whereas scenarios including high levels of satisfaction increase the likelihood of preferring to live for longer in poor health. The differences highlight the sensitivity of preferences to what is described in health states and therefore show the importance of on-going discussions about precisely what respondents should be asked to consider in preference elicitation studies.

PMID:
23665539
PMCID:
PMC3690474
DOI:
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center