Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 May 10;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-10.

Comparing the effects of isoflurane and pentobarbital on the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Author information

1
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. sliman@uchicago.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

While pentobarbital has been used extensively in neurophysiological experiments investigating activity in peripheral nerves, it has fallen out of favor as an anesthetic because of safety concerns and is often replaced with isoflurane. However, the effects of isoflurane on the excitability of mechanoreceptive afferents have yet to be conclusively elucidated.

METHODS:

To fill this gap, we collected extracellular single-unit recordings of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents from the sciatic nerve of 21 rats during vibratory stimulation of the hindpaw. We then compared the strength and temporal structure of the afferent response measured under pentobarbital and isoflurane anesthesia.

RESULTS:

We found that the strength and temporal structure of afferent responses were statistically equivalent whether these were evoked under isoflurane or pentobarbital.

CONCLUSIONS:

We conclude that, if these two anesthetics have any effect on the responses of mechanoreceptive afferents, their effects are indistinguishable.

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center