Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;11(7):1240-50. doi: 10.1111/jth.12294.

Impact of double-blind vs. open study design on the observed treatment effects of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Service de Médecine Interne et de Médecine Vasculaire, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France. jean-christophe.lega@chu-lyon.fr

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) design has been proposed as a valid alternative to the double-blind (DB) design for trials comparing new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) with INR-adjusted vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether the observed treatment effects of NOAs in patients with NVAF differ between PROBE/open-label trials and DB trials.

METHODS:

All phase II or III trials were eligible. The main efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding, respectively. Other outcomes included ischemic SSE, hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial and extracranial bleeding, myocardial infarction, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Interaction (Cochran's chi-squared test) between PROBE and DB designs was tested.

RESULTS:

Thirteen studies (61 620 patients) were included. For SSE, a greater treatment effect of NOAs vs. INR-adjusted warfarin was observed in PROBE trials (RR 0.76, CI 0.65-0.89) compared with DB trials (RR 0.88, CI 0.78-0.98), but the interaction test was non-significant (P = 0.16). A significant 67% enhancement of treatment effect was found with PROBE/open-label trials compared with DB trials (interaction test, P = 0.05) for hemorrhagic stroke. No other interaction was significant. A non-significant interaction (P = 0.07) between oral direct thrombin inhibitors (RR 0.33; 0.22-0.51) and factor Xa inhibitors (RR 0.54; 0.40-0.72) was seen. No heterogeneity was found for any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our meta-analysis showed no significant interaction of study design for the main efficacy and safety outcomes. However, the non-significantly exaggerated reduction in SSE suggests interdependence of treatment effect and PROBE design, especially for hemorrhagic stroke.

KEYWORDS:

anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; bias; meta-analysis; stroke

PMID:
23659614
DOI:
10.1111/jth.12294
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center