Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Adv Ther. 2013 May;30(5):459-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0029-0. Epub 2013 May 8.

Evaluation of a new formulation of epoprostenol sodium in Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (EPITOME4).

Author information

1
Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. u1@ta-mu.net

Erratum in

  • Adv Ther. 2013 May;30(5):554-5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with poor prognosis despite significant recent advances in its treatment. An intravenous formulation of epoprostenol sodium containing glycine and mannitol (epoprostenol GM; GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) is widely used to treat PAH. A new formulation of epoprostenol sodium containing arginine and sucrose excipients (epoprostenol AS; Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) shows better stability at room temperature after preparing diluted solutions. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of switching from epoprostenol GM to epoprostenol AS in Japanese patients with PAH. The authors also evaluated the efficacy and treatment satisfaction after switching formulations.

METHODS:

This was a two-site, open-label, single-arm, Phase 3b study. Eight adult Japanese PAH patients (seven females) treated with a stable dose of epoprostenol GM for ≥30 days were switched to epoprostenol AS and followed for 12 weeks. Outcomes included safety, changes from baseline to 12 weeks in pulmonary hemodynamic factors (pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and cardiac output), and treatment satisfaction, assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).

RESULTS:

The mean (range) age and time since diagnosis of PAH were 48 (25-69) years and 6.2 (0.6-13.9) years, respectively. There were no unexpected safety or tolerability concerns after switching formulations. The epoprostenol dose was maintained after switching formulations. There were no significant changes in pulmonary hemodynamic factors from baseline to week 12. Regarding treatment satisfaction, there was a significant improvement in convenience, which is demonstrated in the score of the domain increased from 51.40 ± 10.19 at baseline to 58.33 ± 12.96 at week 12 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Switching from epoprostenol GM to the same dose of epoprostenol AS was well tolerated over 12 weeks of treatment, and pulmonary hemodynamics were maintained. Switching to epoprostenol AS was also associated with improvements in treatment satisfaction (convenience). Clinical Trials: JapicCTI-122017.

PMID:
23653230
PMCID:
PMC3680653
DOI:
10.1007/s12325-013-0029-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center