Send to

Choose Destination
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 May;88(5):455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.02.013.

Cardiovascular fitness and mortality after contemporary cardiac rehabilitation.

Author information

Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.



To assess the association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and outcomes in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) cohort.


We conducted a retrospective study of 5641 patients (4282 men [76%] and 1359 women [24%]; mean ± SD age, 60.0±10.3 years) with coronary artery disease who participated in CR between July 1, 1996, and February 28, 2009. Based on peak metabolic equivalents (METs), patients were classified as low fitness (LFit) (<5 METs), moderate fitness (5-8 METs), or high fitness (>8 METs).


Baseline fitness predicted long-term mortality: relative to the LFit group, patients with moderate fitness had an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.42-0.69), and those with high fitness a hazard ratio of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.24-0.44). Improvement in CRF at 12 weeks was associated with decreased overall mortality, with a 13% point reduction with each MET increase (P<.001) and a 30% point reduction in those who started with LFit. At 1 year, each MET increase in CRF was associated with a 25% point reduction in overall mortality in the whole group (P<.001).


In this study of contemporary CR patients, higher baseline fitness predicted lower mortality. The novel finding was that improvement in fitness during a CR program and improvements that persisted at 1 year were also associated with decreased mortality, most strongly in patients who start with LFit.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center