Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Environ Pollut. 2013 Nov;182:448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.034. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

Can citizen science produce good science? Testing the OPAL Air Survey methodology, using lichens as indicators of nitrogenous pollution.

Author information

1
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK; Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

Abstract

Citizen science is having increasing influence on environmental monitoring as its advantages are becoming recognised. However methodologies are often simplified to make them accessible to citizen scientists. We tested whether a recent citizen science survey (the OPAL Air Survey) could detect trends in lichen community composition over transects away from roads. We hypothesised that the abundance of nitrophilic lichens would decrease with distance from the road, while that of nitrophobic lichens would increase. The hypothesised changes were detected along strong pollution gradients, but not where the road source was relatively weak, or background pollution relatively high. We conclude that the simplified OPAL methodology can detect large contrasts in nitrogenous pollution, but it may not be able to detect more subtle changes in pollution exposure. Similar studies are needed in conjunction with the ever-growing body of citizen science work to ensure that the limitations of these methods are fully understood.

KEYWORDS:

Air pollution; Biomonitoring; Citizen science; Lichens; OPAL

PMID:
23631940
DOI:
10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.034
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center