Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Apr 18;2013. pii: bcr2013008700. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-008700.

Pleural infection: a case where clinical improvement was misleading.

Author information

  • 1Department of General Medicine, Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, UK. justin.gould@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

A 28-year-old Gurkha soldier presented with signs of severe chest sepsis and respiratory distress. High-flow oxygen, broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and intravenous fluids were started immediately. Bedside thoracic ultrasound demonstrated a moderate right pleural effusion suggestive of an empyema. A pleural aspirate was borderline for pleural infection, therefore, a chest drain was inserted and the patient was transferred to high dependency. Within 48 h the patient clinically improved. Three weeks later, a persistently raised C reactive protein and indeterminate right lower lobe radiographic changes was observed. Video-assisted thorascopic surgery was subsequently performed. Although technically difficult, a large amount of pus was drained from the pleural cavity. The patient was discharged, returning to normal army duties 8 weeks later. Follow-up chest radiographs showed complete resolution of the empyema and no evidence of scarring. The CRP normalised to <1.

PMID:
23605824
PMCID:
PMC3645067
DOI:
10.1136/bcr-2013-008700
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center