Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):353-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486182. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5.

Author information

1
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. dbsamuel@purdue.edu

Abstract

The DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.) Section III will include an alternative hybrid system for the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD). This alternative system defines PD types partly through specific combinations of maladaptive traits, rather than by using a set of polythetic diagnostic criteria. The current report utilizes a large sample of undergraduates (n = 1,159) to examine three dimensional methods for comparing an individual's trait profile to each PD type. We found that the sum of an individual's scores on the assigned traits obtained large convergent correlations (Mdn r =.61) and best reproduced the patterns of PD discriminant correlations observed within the DSM-IV measure. We also tested the DSM-5 Section III model algorithms and compared them with different thresholds for assigning categorical diagnoses. Frequency rates using the algorithms were greatly reduced, whereas requiring half of the assigned traits produced rates that more closely approximated current prevalence estimates. Our research suggests that DSM-5 Section III trait model can reproduce the DSM-IV-TR PD constructs and identifies effective methods of doing so.

KEYWORDS:

PDQ-4; PID-5; dimensional model; personality disorder; prototype matching

PMID:
23588686
DOI:
10.1177/1073191113486182
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center