Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

The single-centre experience of the supra-arch chimney technique in endovascular repair of type B aortic dissections.

Author information

1
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 301 General Hospital of PLA, 28#, Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We summarised the data performed at our centre to evaluate the feasibility of the chimney technique in type B aortic dissections (ADs) with supra-aortic vessel involvement.

METHODS:

From September 2006 to December 2011, 34 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVARs) for ADs were performed combined with reconstruction of the arch branches with chimney stents (innominate artery, IA, n = 3; left common carotid artery, LCCA, n = 8; left subclavian artery, LSA, n = 23). Indications for these chimney stents included an inadequate proximal landing zone (<1.5 cm); high surgical-risk patients who are not suitable for open repair or hybrid procedures; and emergent endovascular repair of ADs. The series consisted of 13 acute, 12 sub-acute and 9 chronic cases. The right common carotid-left common carotid-left subclavian artery bypasses were performed in the IA chimney cases to reserve an adequate cerebral perfusion from the LCCA and left vertebral artery, while the left common carotid-left subclavian artery bypasses were performed in the cases having dominant left vertebral arteries. All the TEVARs, chimney stents and bypasses were performed as a single stage. Follow-ups were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS:

Endografts were deployed in Zone 0 (n = 3, 9%), Zone 1 (n = 8, 24%) and Zone 2 (n = 23, 67%). Twenty-five (74%) balloon-expandable and 9 (26%) self-expanding stents were used, of which seven (21%) were covered and 27 (79%) were bare stents. The technical success rate was 82% (28/34). Immediate type I endoleaks were observed in five patients (5/34, 15%), all of which underwent bare chimney-stent repairs. Three self-expanding chimney stents were compressed by endografts and another balloon expandable stent was deployed inside the first one. Five patients underwent surgical bypasses (RCCA-LCCA-LSA, n = 3; LCCA-LSA, n = 2). Perioperative morbidity included one ST-elevation myocardial infarction. No perioperative death or stroke was observed. The mean follow-up was 16.3 months (range, 3-60 months). Primary patency was maintained in all the chimney stents as well as the surgical bypasses. No stent fracture or recurrent chimney-related endoleak was observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS:

In repairs for type B ADs, the chimney technique provides a minimally invasive way of preserving flow to the arch branches combined with a favourable mid-term outcome. The bare stents seemed to be related to a higher probability of the immediate type I endoleaks. A balloon-expandable stent should be regarded as the first choice due to its greater radial strength.

PMID:
23540806
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.016
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center