Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Glycoconj J. 2013 Oct;30(7):677-85. doi: 10.1007/s10719-013-9472-z. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

Effects of cell surface α2-3 sialic acid on osteogenesis.

Author information

1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215007, China.

Abstract

A cell culture model of osteoblast differentiation was applied in our study of the effect of sialic acid on the osteogenesis by using the pre-osteoblast of MC3T3-E1 subclone 14 cells. Following the treatment of different concentrations of α2,3-neuraminidase, which specifically removed the α2-3 sialic acid from cell surface, a significant decrease of α2-3 sialic acid was detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Maackia amurensis lectin (MAL-II) by flow cytometry analysis. von Kossa staining showed that the bone mineralization decreased in MC3T3-E1 subclone 14 cells after the treatment of α2,3-neuraminidase for 2 weeks. However α2,3-neuraminidase did not affect the formation of osteoblasts in MC3T3-E1 subclone 14 cells, which was demonstrated by positive alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-staining. Characteristic biological markers and osteoblast-like cell-related factors of osteoblastic cells were also examined. Both RT-PCR and Western blot analysis demonstrated that the expression of bone sialoprotein (BSP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and vitamin D receptor (VDR) were significantly decreased when α2-3 sialic acid expression decreased on the cell surface, while the expression of osteocalcin (OC) and osteopontin (OPN) remained unchanged. We propose a hypothesis that α2-3 sialic acid affects bone mineralization but not osteogenic differentiation.

PMID:
23519914
DOI:
10.1007/s10719-013-9472-z
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center