Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1512. doi: 10.1038/srep01512.

Using false discovery rates to benchmark SNP-callers in next-generation sequencing projects.

Author information

1
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. r.farrer09@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Sequence alignments form the basis for many comparative and population genomic studies. Alignment tools provide a range of accuracies dependent on the divergence between the sequences and the alignment methods. Despite widespread use, there is no standard method for assessing the accuracy of a dataset and alignment strategy after resequencing. We present a framework and tool for determining the overall accuracies of an input read dataset, alignment and SNP-calling method providing an isolate in that dataset has a corresponding, or closely related reference sequence available. In addition to this tool for comparing False Discovery Rates (FDR), we include a method for determining homozygous and heterozygous positions from an alignment using binomial probabilities for an expected error rate. We benchmark this method against other SNP callers using our FDR method with three fungal genomes, finding that it was able achieve a high level of accuracy. These tools are available at http://cfdr.sourceforge.net/.

PMID:
23518929
PMCID:
PMC3604800
DOI:
10.1038/srep01512
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center