Send to

Choose Destination
Simul Healthc. 2013 Aug;8(4):253-61. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31828715b1.

Comparative research on training simulators in emergency medicine: a methodological review.

Author information

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Erratum in

  • Simul Healthc. 2013 Oct;8(5):349. Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division [removed].


Recent reviews and research agenda in simulation-based training for health care have repeatedly called for more studies comparing the effectiveness of different simulation modalities and approaches. Although a small body of such comparative research does exist, it is apparent that this line of research comes with particular methodological challenges. In this review, 20 studies comparing simulation modalities in emergency medicine were analyzed in terms of key methodological factors. Results of this literature review show that (1) past studies are largely underpowered to detect effects of the magnitude likely to be found, (2) researchers seeking to demonstrate equivalence of training approaches do not use appropriate statistical tests of equivalence, and (3) studies often use performance criterion test beds that may not support valid conclusions about trainees' future performance on the job. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of reviewed studies along these issues and recommend options for improving future comparative research in simulation-based training.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center