Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Hum Kinet. 2012 Oct;34:105-11. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0069-6. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Acute effects of dropsets among different resistance training methods in upper body performance.

Author information

1
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Programa de pós-graduação stricto-sensu EEFD/UFRJ. Rio de Janeiro, BRASIL.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of including dropset exercises in different orders, both in the pre-exhaustion, as in the post-exhaustion method, and to analyze the performance of total work on the bench press and chest flying exercise. Twenty-two male volunteers with a recreational experience in ST were evaluated in six visits in non-consecutive days, at approximately the same time of the day. During the first visit, subjects signed an informed consent form and underwent an anthropometric evaluation and testing of 10RM. The second visit involved a re-test of 10RM. From third to sixth visits, the subjects were randomly grouped into the following experimental situations: 3rd Visit (V3 - Post-exhaustion): Bench Press (dropset) + Chest Flying (10RM); 4th visit (V4 - Post-exhaustion): Bench Press (10RM) + Chest Flying (dropset); 5th Visit (V5 - pre-exhaustion): Chest Flying (dropset) + Bench Press (10RM); 6th Visit (V6 - pre-exhaustion): Chest Flying (10RM) + Bench Press (dropset). The protocol of dropset was performed with 3 sets and no rest intervals 10RM + 80% 10RM + 60% 10RM. An interval between sets was adopted for 2 minutes. The primary results showed a significant difference in Total Work for visits V3 and V6, which was included in the dropset multiarticular exercises. These results suggest that the exercise order with the dropset method in the pre-exhaustion or post-exhaustion methods had an acute influence on Total Work.

KEYWORDS:

Performance; number of repetitions; resistance exercise; training method

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center