Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8.

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Author information

1
Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. rlk2@columbia.edu

Abstract

IRBs have been criticized for long and complicated consent forms, but how IRBs make decisions about these issues hasn't been examined. I contacted leaders of 60 IRBs, and interviewed IRB leaders from 34 (response rate = 55%), and 13 members and administrators. IRBs confront challenges and dilemmas regarding these documents: what and how much these forms should include (e.g., how "perfect" forms should be). While IRBs generally seek to decrease the length and complexity, institutions and industry funders often want these forms to be legal documents. IRBs may also "nitpick" these documents without realizing the costs. This study, the first to explore how IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms, suggests underlying tensions, ambiguities, and subjectivities that have important implications for future policy, practice, education, and research.

PMID:
23485667
PMCID:
PMC3752393
DOI:
10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center