Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Oct 30;209(3):711-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: a pooled analysis.

Author information

1
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Electronic address: ulrich.reininghaus@kcl.ac.uk.

Abstract

Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.

KEYWORDS:

Convergent validity; Discriminant validity; Multitrait-multimethod validation; Outcome assessment; Patient-reported outcomes

PMID:
23452753
DOI:
10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center