Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;48(4):544-8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0767-4. Epub 2013 Feb 23.

KRAS mutation status is not predictive for objective response to anti-EGFR treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. stefan.boeck@med.uni-muenchen.de

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

It has not yet been defined if KRAS has a prognostic value or is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS:

AIO-PK0104 was a phase III trial comparing gemcitabine/erlotinib followed by capecitabine with capecitabine/erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced PC. For this post hoc subgroup analysis, biomarker data on the KRAS exon 2 mutation status were correlated with objective response to 1st-line therapy and with overall survival after start of 2nd-line chemotherapy (OSc).

RESULTS:

KRAS codon 12 was mutated in 121 of 173 (70 %) patients. The KRAS status showed no association with objective response (p = 0.40), but KRAS wildtype patients had an improved OS (HR 1.68, p = 0.005). A trend for a survival benefit was also observed during (non-erlotinib containing) 2nd-line chemotherapy, with a HR of 1.47 (p = 0.10) for the OSc.

CONCLUSION:

This post hoc analysis of AIO-PK0104 supports the assumption that KRAS is rather a prognostic than a predictive biomarker in PC.

PMID:
23435671
DOI:
10.1007/s00535-013-0767-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center