Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Apr;21(2):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00228.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

The views of pharmacists who participated in a community pharmacy randomised controlled trial.

Author information

1
School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. m.twigg@uea.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Examining case studies of research projects can prove useful to determine what design aspects can be changed to improve the robustness and feasibility of future projects.

METHODS:

Pharmacists who took part as research partners in a feasibility study of an eczema support service that failed to achieve its recruitment objectives were asked to attend a focus group to determine their views about factors that may have affected pharmacist recruitment rate.

KEY FINDINGS:

Pharmacists expressed positive opinions about being involved in research in principle and remaining engaged for further projects. However, they identified problems in their relationship with the medical practices, their unfamiliarity with this particular study design and the challenges this brought. They also experienced frustration from delays to the research timetable holding back their contribution to the research.

CONCLUSION:

In this case study, pharmacists described how and why they wanted a study process to be made as simple and easy as possible for the participants and themselves to engage in, so as to maintain their own and participants' engagement in studies.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center