Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Safety Res. 2013 Feb;44:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Workplace violence among Pennsylvania education workers: differences among occupations.

Author information

1
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Analysis and Field Evaluations Branch, USA. htiesman@cdc.gov

Abstract

PROBLEM:

The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence and characteristics of physical and non-physical WPV in a state-based cohort of education workers.

METHOD:

A sample of 6,450 workers was drawn using de-identified union membership lists, stratified on gender, occupation, and school location. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to participants.

RESULTS:

An estimated 7.8% (95%CI=6.6-9.1) of education workers were physically assaulted and 28.9% (95%CI=26.4-31.5) experienced a non-physical WPV event during the 2009-2010 school year. Special education teachers were significantly more likely to be physically assaulted and experience a non-physical WPV event compared to general education teachers (Prevalence Rate Ratio=3.6, 95% 2.4-5.5; PRR=1.4, 95%CI=1.1-1.8).

DISCUSSION:

Special education teachers were at the highest risk for both physical and non-physical WPV. If not already present, schools should consider implementing comprehensive WPV prevention programs for their employees.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY:

Special education teachers have unique workplace hazards. Strategies that protect the special education teacher, while still protecting the special education student should be considered.

PMID:
23398707
PMCID:
PMC4570475
DOI:
10.1016/j.jsr.2012.09.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center