Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.019. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Accuracy of end-tidal CO2 capnometers in post-cardiac surgery patients during controlled mechanical ventilation.

Author information

1
Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The determination of end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) is very helpful in cardiac resuscitation for confirmation and monitoring of endotracheal tube placement and as an indicator of return of circulation and effectiveness of chest compressions. There is now also widespread use of capnometry on-site at emergency and trauma fields.

OBJECTIVE:

We studied the accuracy and correlation of three capnometers (EMMA, Medtronic, and Evita) with partial pressure of arterial CO2 (PaCO2) measurements.

METHODS:

The three capnometers were placed in-line in the ventilator tubing of the patient. Forty sedated and mechanically ventilated post-cardiac surgery patients were studied. Twenty consecutive etCO2 values were collected simultaneously from all three monitors while drawing an arterial blood sample. Paired sample t-test and Pearson correlation were used to compare the capnometers and their correlation with PaCO2.

RESULTS:

The correlation of etCO2 measurements between all three capnometers was good (Emma vs. Evita: 0.874, Emma vs. Medtronic: 0.949, Evita vs. Medtronic: 0.878). The correlation of PaCO2 with the Evita is the lowest (0.671) as compared to the EMMA (0.693) and the Medtronic (0.727). The lowest dispersion of the difference between etCO2 and PaCO2 was seen in EMMA (3.30), the highest in Evita (3.98).

CONCLUSIONS:

A good correlation between etCO2 and PaCO2 was shown with the three capnometers in the present study. However, etCO2 measurements were not valid to estimate PaCO2 in these patients. Therefore, capnometry cannot be used to replace serial blood gas analyses completely, but may be a good cardiopulmonary trend monitor and alerting system in catastrophic events.

PMID:
23375221
DOI:
10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.019
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center