Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuromodulation. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):226-9; discussion 229. doi: 10.1111/ner.12026. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Rechargeable vs. nonrechargeable internal pulse generators in the management of dystonia.

Author information

1
Department of Neurological Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK. martin.gillies@ouh.nhs.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To test if deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of dystonia was similar in patients before and after implantation of rechargeable internal pulse generators (IPGs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) severity and disability scores were compared in patients before DBS insertion, 24 months after DBS insertion with a nonrechargeable IPG, and after implantation of a rechargeable IPG.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were observed between dystonia control in patients before and after implantation of a rechargeable IPG.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rechargeable IPGs should be the IPGs of choice for dystonic patients receiving DBS as IPGs offer similar treatment efficacy to nonrechargeable IPGs with advantages in terms of costs and reductions in reimplantation frequency.

PMID:
23363250
DOI:
10.1111/ner.12026
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center