Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.041. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings.

Author information

1
Princeton University, Office of Population Research, 259 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: echiarel@princeton.edu.

Abstract

Social science studies of bioethics demonstrate that ethics are highly contextual, functioning differently across local settings as actors make daily decisions "on the ground." Sociological studies that demonstrate the key role organizations play in shaping ethical decision-making have disproportionately focused on physicians and nurses working in hospital settings where they contend with life and death issues. This study broadens our understanding of the contexts of ethical decision-making by empirically examining understudied healthcare professionals - pharmacists - working in two organizational settings, retail and hospital, where they act as gatekeepers to regulated goods and services as they contend with ethical issues ranging from the serious to the mundane. This study asks: How do organizations shape pharmacists' identification, negotiation, and resolution of ethical challenges; in other words, how do organizations shape pharmacists' gatekeeping processes? Based on 95 semi-structured interviews with U.S. pharmacists practicing in retail and hospital pharmacies conducted between September 2009 and May 2011, this research finds that organizations influence ethical decision-making by shaping how pharmacists construct four gatekeeping processes: medical, legal, fiscal, and moral. Each gatekeeping process manifests differently across organizations due to how these settings structure inter-professional power dynamics, proximity to patients, and means of accessing information. Findings suggest new directions for theorizing about ethical decision-making in medical contexts by drawing attention to new ethical actors, new organizational settings, an expanded definition of ethical challenges, and a broader conceptualization of gatekeeping.

KEYWORDS:

Bioethics; Decision-making; Gatekeeping; Organizations; Pharmacy; Professions; Sociology; United states

PMID:
23337832
DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.041
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center