Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BJOG. 2013 Apr;120(5):594-606. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12150. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Meeting the challenge of interpreting high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array data in prenatal diagnosis: does increased diagnostic power outweigh the dilemma of rare variants?

Author information

1
VCGS Cytogenetics Laboratory, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Several studies have already shown the superiority of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) compared with conventional karyotyping for prenatal investigation of fetal ultrasound abnormality. This study used very high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to determine the impact on detection rates of all clinical categories of copy number variations (CNVs), and address the issue of interpreting and communicating findings of uncertain or unknown clinical significance, which are to be expected at higher frequency when using very high-resolution CMA.

DESIGN:

Prospective validation study.

SETTING:

Tertiary clinical genetics centre.

POPULATION:

Women referred for further investigation of fetal ultrasound anomaly.

METHODS:

We prospectively tested 104 prenatal samples using both conventional karyotyping and high-resolution arrays.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The detection rates for each clinical category of CNV.

RESULTS:

Unequivocal pathogenic CNVs were found in six cases, including one with uniparental disomy (paternal UPD 14). A further four cases had a 'likely pathogenic' finding. Overall, CMA improved the detection of 'pathogenic' and 'likely pathogenic' abnormalities from 2.9% (3/104) to 9.6% (10/104). CNVs of 'unknown' clinical significance that presented interpretational difficulties beyond results from parental investigations were detected in 6.7% (7/104) of samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

Increased detection sensitivity appears to be the main benefit of high-resolution CMA. Despite this, in this cohort there was no significant benefit in terms of improving detection of small pathogenic CNVs. A potential disadvantage is the high detection rate of CNVs of 'unknown' clinical significance. These findings emphasise the importance of establishing an evidence-based policy for the interpretation and reporting of CNVs, and the need to provide appropriate pre- and post-test counselling.

PMID:
23332022
DOI:
10.1111/1471-0528.12150
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center