Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Gene. 1990 Mar 1;87(1):7-13.

Gene duplication in the evolution of the two complementing domains of gram-negative bacterial tetracycline efflux proteins.

Author information

1
Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111.

Abstract

The resistance of Gram- bacteria to the broad-spectrum antibiotic tetracycline (Tc) results from energy-dependent drug efflux mediated by the tet gene product, the cytoplasmic membrane Tet protein. Amino acid (aa) sequences deduced from total tet nucleotide sequences of three different resistance determinants (classes A, B and C) indicate that the protein products [Tet(A), Tet(B), and Tet(C)] share a common ancestor. Hydropathic analysis of Tet sequences predicts twelve transmembrane segments in each protein, with six occurring in each half of the molecule. More importantly, the linear distributions of these segments in the N- and C-terminal halves are nearly identical, suggesting that the two halves of each Tet protein are related by a process of tandem gene duplication and divergence. Indeed, a variable but significant conservation of sequence was detected among the N- and C-terminal halves for all possible comparisons of the three proteins. Such conservation was not observed within other prokaryotic integral membrane proteins or when other prokaryotic proteins were compared to Tet halves. Similarity, both in sequence and in predicted transmembrane structural organization, strongly suggests that a common ancestor of Tet(A), Tet(B), and Tet(C) arose by duplication of a gene reading frame specifying a transmembrane protein of approximately 200 aa residues. The two halves of Tet proteins correspond to the two domains, alpha and beta, which have distinct, complementary roles in Tc efflux. Nevertheless, selective constraints to function in the cytoplasmic membrane have apparently led to maintenance of similar patterns of secondary structural organization in these complementary domains.

PMID:
2332166
DOI:
10.1016/0378-1119(90)90489-e
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center