Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan 14;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-1.

Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders: it is time to talk.

Author information

1
Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. peter.brindley@albertahealthservices.ca.

Abstract

A study by Burkle et al. in BMC Anesthesiology examined attitudes around perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders. Questionnaires were given to patients, as well as to anesthesiologists, internists and surgeons. The study has limitations and is open to interpretation. However, the findings are important. There appear to be attitudinal differences between patients and doctors, and between specialties. A small majority of patients are content to have a do-not-resuscitate order postponed during the perioperative period. A large majority expects open communication from doctors before proceeding. However, this article could also encourage a broader debate. This is about how to respect patient autonomy, while ensuring that resuscitation truly serves the patient's best interests. This commentary outlines how more communication is needed at the bedside and in wider society.

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center