Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Langmuir. 2013 Feb 5;29(5):1634-41. doi: 10.1021/la304472w. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

Nanoparticles assume electrical potential according to substrate, size, and surface termination.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Cukrovarnick√° 10, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic. stehlik@fzu.cz

Abstract

Electrical potential of nanoparticles under relevant environment is substantial for their applications in electronics as well as sensors and biology. Here, we use Kelvin force microscopy to characterize electrical properties of semiconducting diamond nanoparticles (DNPs) of 5-10 nm nominal size and metallic gold nanoparticles (20 and 40 nm) on Si and Au substrates under ambient conditions. The DNPs are deposited on Si and Au substrates from dispersions with well-defined zeta-potential. We show that the nanoparticle potential depends on its size and that the only reliable potential characteristic is a linear fit of this dependence within a 5-50 nm range. Systematically different potentials of hydrogenated, oxidized, and graphitized DNPs are resolved using this methodology. The differences are within 50 mV, that is much lower than on monocrystalline diamond. Furthermore, all of the nanoparticles assume their potential within -60 mV according to the Au and Si substrate, thus gaining up to 0.4 V difference. This effect is attributed to DNP charging by charge transfer and/or polarization. This is confirmed by secondary electron emission. Such effects are general with broad implications for nanoparticles applications.

PMID:
23305296
DOI:
10.1021/la304472w
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Chemical Society
    Loading ...
    Support Center