Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Psychol Sci. 2013 Feb 1;24(2):197-205. doi: 10.1177/0956797612451471. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments.

Author information

1
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. vladasg@umn.edu

Abstract

Just as modern economies undergo periods of boom and bust, human ancestors experienced cycles of abundance and famine. Is the adaptive response when resources become scarce to save for the future or to spend money on immediate gains? Drawing on life-history theory, we propose that people's responses to resource scarcity depend on the harshness of their early-life environment, as reflected by childhood socioeconomic status (SES). In the three experiments reported here, we tested how people from different childhood environments responded to resource scarcity. We found that people who grew up in lower-SES environments were more impulsive, took more risks, and approached temptations more quickly. Conversely, people who grew up in higher-SES environments were less impulsive, took fewer risks, and approached temptations more slowly. Responses similarly diverged according to people's oxidative-stress levels-a urinary biomarker of cumulative stress exposure. Overall, whereas tendencies associated with early-life environments were dormant in benign conditions, they emerged under conditions of economic uncertainty.

PMID:
23302295
DOI:
10.1177/0956797612451471
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center