Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr;28(4):654-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.028. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

What is the upper limit of cement penetration for different femoral hip resurfacing components?

Author information

1
Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

We used a validated femoral resurfacing model to obtain measurements of pressure and temperature and quantify cement distribution as a function of inner geometry and cementing technique of five different femoral hip resurfacing components. The purpose was to investigate if manufacture cementing recommendations are reliable. ASR showed only with the recommended manual cementing technique low cement pressures of 58.0±50.2kPa and low interface temperatures of 33.3±4.1°C. BHR had large cement defects of 10.4±1.1mm. Conserve Plus caused the smallest cement penetration depths of 2.9±0.6mm. Durom was tolerant against changes of the cementing technique but showed the widest spread of temperature data 42.8±7.0°C. ReCap showed the highest risk for incomplete seating with a cement mantle thickness of 4.3±0.9mm. Polymerization heat did not exceed the threshold of 45°C with a cement penetration depth of less than 4.2mm in any circumstances of this study.

PMID:
23246349
DOI:
10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.028
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center