Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychophysiology. 2013 Feb;50(2):174-86. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12001. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study.

Author information

Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Erratum in


There is considerable variability in the quantification of event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes and latencies. We examined susceptibility of ERP quantification measures to incremental increases in background noise through published ERP data and simulations. Measures included mean amplitude, adaptive mean, peak amplitude, peak latency, and centroid latency. Results indicated mean amplitude was the most robust against increases in background noise. The adaptive mean measure was more biased, but represented an efficient estimator of the true ERP signal particularly for individual-subject latency variability. Strong evidence is provided against using peak amplitude. For latency measures, the peak latency measure was less biased and less efficient than the centroid latency measurement. Results emphasize the prudence in reporting the number of trials retained for averaging as well as noise estimates for groups and conditions when comparing ERPs.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center