Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 10;32(15):2571-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.5695. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.

Author information

1
Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46020, USA. huipxu@iupui.edu

Abstract

Intermediate test results often occur with diagnostic tests. When assessing diagnostic accuracy, it is important to properly report and account for these results. In the literature, these results are commonly discarded prior to analysis or treated as either a positive or a negative result. Although such adjustments allow sensitivity and specificity to be computed in the standard way, these forced decisions limit the interpretability and usefulness of the results. Estimation of diagnostic accuracy is further complicated when tests are evaluated without a gold standard. Although traditional latent class modeling can be readily applied to analyze these data and account for intermediate results, these models assume that tests are independent conditional on the true disease status, which is rarely valid in practice. We extend both the log-linear latent class model and the probit latent class model to accommodate the conditional dependence among tests while taking the intermediate results into consideration. We illustrate our methods using a simulation study and a published medical study on the detection of epileptiform activity in the brain.

PMID:
23212851
DOI:
10.1002/sim.5695
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center