Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Autumn;24(3):176-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.10.004.

Variation in the standard of minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer--systematic review.

Author information

1
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. g.hanna@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been increasingly performed to treat esophageal cancer. Studies published between 1990 and 2012 that described the use of MIE for cancer in at least 50 patients were included for systematic review. The literature search retrieved 34 publications comprising 18 case series, 15 comparative studies, and 1 randomized control trial. Results revealed a wide variability in surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes with a lack of standardized definitions of postoperative complications. In most studies, radical formal lymphadenectomy was not performed and the lymph node harvest fell below the minimum number recommended to achieve survival benefits. There is a need to reach a consensus regarding surgical approaches in MIE, the definition of postoperative complications and the extent of lymphadenectomy before embarking on further randomized controlled trials comparing MIE vs. open approach.

PMID:
23200072
DOI:
10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.10.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center