Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 22;280(1751):20121937. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1937.

Genetic relatedness to sisters' children has been underestimated.

Author information

1
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 270 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. rogers@anthro.utah.edu

Abstract

Males of many species help in the care and provisioning of offspring, and these investments often correlate with genetic relatedness. For example, many human males invest in the children of sisters, and this is especially so where men are less likely to share genes with children of wives. Although this makes qualitative sense, it has been difficult to support quantitatively. The prevailing model predicts investment in children of sisters only when paternity confidence falls below 0.268. This value is often seen as too low to be credible; so investment in sisters' children represents an unsolved problem. I show here that the prevailing model rests on a series of restrictive assumptions that underestimate relatedness to sisters' children. For this reason, it understates the fitness payoff to men who invest in these children. This effect can be substantial, especially in societies with low confidence in paternity. But this effect cannot be estimated solely from confidence in paternity. One must also estimate the probability that two siblings share the same father.

PMID:
23193121
PMCID:
PMC3574401
DOI:
10.1098/rspb.2012.1937
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center